Accounting for estimation uncertainty and shrinkage in Bayesian within-subject intervals: a comment on Nathoo, Kilshaw, and Masson (2018)

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2018.11.002zbMATH Open1416.62424OpenAlexW2902847526MaRDI QIDQ1736022FDOQ1736022

Authors: Daniel W. Heck 

Publication date: 29 March 2019

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://psyarxiv.com/whp8t/

Recommendations

• A better (Bayesian) interval estimate for within-subject designs
• Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals Shrinking Both Means and Variances
• Bayesian alternatives to null-hypothesis significance testing for repeated-measures designs
• Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals for a Series of Related Experiments
• Empirical Bayes interval estimates that are conditionally equal to unadjusted confidence intervals or to default prior credibility intervals

zbMATH Keywords

credible intervalrepeated-measures designswithin-subject Bayesian inferencelinear mixed modelhighest-density interval

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian inference (62F15) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12)

Cites Work

• Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (Comment on article by Browne and Draper)
• Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs
• A better (Bayesian) interval estimate for within-subject designs
• Estimation with quadratic loss.
• What can we learn from plausible values?

Cited In (2)

• Cultural consensus theory for two-dimensional location judgments
• A better (Bayesian) interval estimate for within-subject designs

Uses Software

• lme4
• S-PLUS
• JAGS
• Stan
• BayesDA
• MEMSS
• TreeBUGS

This page was built for publication: Accounting for estimation uncertainty and shrinkage in Bayesian within-subject intervals: a comment on Nathoo, Kilshaw, and Masson (2018)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1736022)