There is no such thing as a \textit{ceteris paribus} law

DOI10.1023/A:1021578127039MaRDI QIDQ1811054zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors James Woodward

Publication date 9 June 2003

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021578127039

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Is there such a thing as a ceteris paribus law?
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} laws: Classification and deconstruction
• When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
• In favor of laws that are not \textit{ceteris paribus} after all

Cited in

(13)

• A multiply qualified conditional analysis of disposition ascription: mapping the conceptual topography of ceteris paribus
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost
• Laws, \textit{ceteris paribus} conditions, and the dynamics of belief
• The epistemic account of ceteris paribus conditions
• Is there such a thing as a ceteris paribus law?
• Ceteris paribus as defaults
• Realization, completers, and ceteris paribus laws in psychology
• When No Law is Better Than a Good Law*
• Cartwright on laws and composition
• When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
• Laws, accidental generalities, and the Lotze uniformity condition
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2236609 (Why is no real title available?)
• Ceteris paribus and ceteris rectis laws: content and causal role

This page was built for publication: There is no such thing as a \textit{ceteris paribus} law

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1811054)