\textit{Ceteris paribus} lost

DOI10.1023/A:1021526110200MaRDI QIDQ1811053zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors John Earman, John T. Roberts, Sheldon R. Smith

Publication date 9 June 2003

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021526110200

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• \textit{Ceteris paribus} laws: Classification and deconstruction
• Is there such a thing as a ceteris paribus law?
• There is no such thing as a \textit{ceteris paribus} law
• In favor of laws that are not \textit{ceteris paribus} after all
• A semantics and methodology for \textit{ceteris paribus} hypotheses

Cited in

(17)

• The econometric consequences of the ceteris paribus condition in economic theory
• A multiply qualified conditional analysis of disposition ascription: mapping the conceptual topography of ceteris paribus
• There is no such thing as a \textit{ceteris paribus} law
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} laws: Classification and deconstruction
• In favor of laws that are not \textit{ceteris paribus} after all
• Pietroski and Rey on ceteris paribus laws
• Is there such a thing as a ceteris paribus law?
• Ceteris paribus (,) logic helps
• Ceteris paribus found?
• Ceteris paribus as defaults
• Realization, completers, and ceteris paribus laws in psychology
• MARSHALL'S CETERIS PARIBUS IN A DYNAMIC FRAMEWORK
• On the epistemological analysis of modeling and computational error in the mathematical sciences
• When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
• Ceteris paribus conditionals and comparative normalcy
• Ceteris paribus and ceteris rectis laws: content and causal role
• Do \textit{ceteris paribus} laws exist? A regularity-based best system analysis

This page was built for publication: \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1811053)