In favor of laws that are not \textit{ceteris paribus} after all

DOI10.1023/A:1021550815652MaRDI QIDQ1811059zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Nancy Cartwright

Publication date 9 June 2003

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021550815652

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost
• Is there such a thing as a ceteris paribus law?
• When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
• Ceteris paribus (,) logic helps
• A semantics and methodology for \textit{ceteris paribus} hypotheses

Cited in

(9)

• A multiply qualified conditional analysis of disposition ascription: mapping the conceptual topography of ceteris paribus
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost
• There is no such thing as a \textit{ceteris paribus} law
• Is there such a thing as a ceteris paribus law?
• Ceteris paribus (,) logic helps
• When No Law is Better Than a Good Law*
• When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
• Modeling cracks and cracking models: Structures, mechanisms, boundary conditions, constraints, inconsistencies and the proper domains of natural laws
• Do \textit{ceteris paribus} laws exist? A regularity-based best system analysis

This page was built for publication: In favor of laws that are not \textit{ceteris paribus} after all

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1811059)