Realization, completers, and ceteris paribus laws in psychology

DOI10.1093/BJPS/AXL029MaRDI QIDQ3592238zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Robert D. Rupert

Publication date 12 September 2007

Published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axl029

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Recommendations

• There is no such thing as a \textit{ceteris paribus} law
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} laws: Classification and deconstruction
• When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
• A semantics and methodology for \textit{ceteris paribus} hypotheses
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost

Cited in

(2)

• Does intentional psychology need vindicating by cognitive science?
• Fodor v. Kripke: semantic dispositionalism, idealization and ceteris paribus clauses

This page was built for publication: Realization, completers, and ceteris paribus laws in psychology

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3592238)