Realization, completers, and ceteris paribus laws in psychology

DOI10.1093/BJPS/AXL029zbMATH Open1122.03301OpenAlexW2001491253MaRDI QIDQ3592238FDOQ3592238

Authors: Robert D. Rupert 

Publication date: 12 September 2007

Published in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axl029

Recommendations

• There is no such thing as a \textit{ceteris paribus} law
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} laws: Classification and deconstruction
• When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity
• A semantics and methodology for \textit{ceteris paribus} hypotheses
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical psychology (91E99) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cited In (2)

• Does intentional psychology need vindicating by cognitive science?
• Fodor v. Kripke: semantic dispositionalism, idealization and ceteris paribus clauses

This page was built for publication: Realization, completers, and ceteris paribus laws in psychology

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3592238)