How truth behaves when there's no vicious reference

DOI10.1007/S10992-010-9136-4MaRDI QIDQ1959327zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Philip Kremer

Publication date 6 October 2010

Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9136-4

zbMATH Keywords

fixed-point semanticsparadoxrevision theorytruthvicious reference

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Alternative ways for truth to behave when there's no vicious reference
• Comparing fixed-point and revision theories of truth
• Modifying Kremer's modified Gupta-Belnap desideratum
• On Gupta-Belnap revision theories of truth, Kripkean fixed points and the next stable set
• Alternative revision theories of truth

Cites work

• Comparing fixed-point and revision theories of truth
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 50690 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 795569 (Why is no real title available?)
• Kripke and the logic of truth
• Outline of a Theory of Truth
• Paradox without Self-Reference
• Truth and paradox

Cited in

(6)

• Comparing more revision and fixed-point theories of truth
• Conditionals in theories of truth
• Modifying Kremer's modified Gupta-Belnap desideratum
• Alternative ways for truth to behave when there's no vicious reference
• Guest editors' introduction
• Comparing fixed-point and revision theories of truth

This page was built for publication: How truth behaves when there's no vicious reference

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1959327)