Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments -- evidence from a natural field experiment
DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2021.01.006zbMATH Open1458.91016OpenAlexW3123727622MaRDI QIDQ1995486FDOQ1995486
Mark Kassis, Sascha L. Schmidt, Dominik Schreyer, Matthias Sutter
Publication date: 23 February 2021
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://www.crema-research.ch/papers/2020-17.pdf
Recommendations
- Incentive effects and overcrowding in tournaments: An experimental analysis
- Behavior in strategic settings: evidence from a million rock-paper-scissors games
- Contests with group size uncertainty: experimental evidence
- Sabotage in tournaments with heterogeneous contestants: empirical evidence from the soccer pitch
- Decision-making in competitive framings -- strategic behavior of chess players in mini-ultimatum game chess puzzles
- Single- and double-elimination tournaments under psychological momentum
- Tournament-induced risk-shifting: a mean field games approach
- When higher prizes lead to lower efforts -- the impact of favoritism in tournaments
- Psychological Nash equilibria under ambiguity
behavioral economicspsychological pressuredynamic tournamentpenalty shoot-outssports professionalsvalue of decision rights
Cites Work
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments -- evidence from a natural field experiment
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1995486)