Behavior in strategic settings: evidence from a million rock-paper-scissors games
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2183997
DOI10.3390/G10020018zbMATH Open1443.91010OpenAlexW2936155039WikidataQ128115292 ScholiaQ128115292MaRDI QIDQ2183997FDOQ2183997
Sonia Jaffe, Jeffrey Picel, Steven Levitt, Dimitris Batzilis, John A. List
Publication date: 27 May 2020
Published in: Games (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g10020018
Recommendations
- Comparing theories of one-shot play out of treatment
- An experimental study of information and mixed-strategy play in the three-person matching-pennies game
- Do we detect and exploit mixed strategy play by opponents?
- Games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria: An experimental study
- Learning behavior in an experimental matching pennies game
Cites Work
- Fictitious play in \(2\times n\) games
- Quantal response equilibria for normal form games
- On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence
- A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The Evolution of Conventions
- Fictitious play property for games with identical interests
- Cycles and Instability in a Rock-Paper-Scissors Population Game: A Continuous Time Experiment
- Evolution of smart\(_ n\) players
- Learning and decision costs in experimental constant sum games
- On the persistence of strategic sophistication
- `Learning' with no feedback in a competitive guessing game.
- Brown's original fictitious play
- Learning behavior in an experimental matching pennies game
- On the irrelevance of risk attitudes in repeated two-outcome games
- An empirical model of non-equilibrium behavior in games
- Behavior in a Dynamic Decision Problem: An Analysis of Experimental Evidence Using a Bayesian Type Classification Algorithm
- A Bayesian hierarchical model for inferring player strategy types in a number guessing game
- Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games
Cited In (12)
- The control of game form recognition in experiments: Understanding dominant strategy failures in a simple two person ``guessing game
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR AND INFORMATION TRANSMISSION IN A STYLIZED (SO-CALLED CHINOS) GUESSING GAME
- Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments -- evidence from a natural field experiment
- How to play \((3\times 3)\)-games.: A strategy method experiment.
- Competing against experienced and inexperienced players
- Separating the hawks from the doves: evidence from continuous time laboratory games
- Salience and strategy choice in \(2\times 2\) games
- David vs. Goliath: An Analysis of Asymmetric Mixed-Strategy Games and Experimental Evidence
- Laboratory Analysis of the Social and Psychophysiological Aspects of the Behaviour of Participants in the Lemons Market Game
- Rock-paper-scissors play: beyond the win-stay/lose-change strategy
- A comparison of naive and sophisticated subject behavior with game theoretic predictions
This page was built for publication: Behavior in strategic settings: evidence from a million rock-paper-scissors games
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2183997)
