A note on the Hambleton-Taylor-Williams conjecture

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2001407



Abstract: I. Hambleton, L. Taylor and B. Williams conjectured a general formula in spirit of H. Lenstra for the decomposition of Gn(RG) for any finite group G and noetherian ring R. The conjectured decomposition was shown to hold for some large classes of finite groups. D. Webb and D. Yao discovered that the conjecture failed for the symmetric group S5, but remarked that it still might be reasonable to expect the HTW-decomposition for solvable groups. In this paper we show that the solvable group mathrmSL(2,mathbbF3) is also a counterexample to the conjectured HTW-decomposition. Furthermore, we prove that for any finite group G the rank of G1(mathbbZG) does not exceed the rank of the expression in the HTW-decomposition.


Let \(G\) be a finite group \(G\) and \(R\) noetherian ring. Consider the \(G\)-theory \(G_i(RG) = K_i(\mathcal{M}(RG))\), \(i \ge 0\), where \(\mathcal{M}(RG)\) is the category of all finitely generated left \(RG\)-modules. \textit{I. Hambleton} et al. [J. Algebra 116, No. 2, 466--470 (1988; Zbl 0658.16019)] conjectured a general formula for the decomposition of \(G_n(RG)\), shown hold for some large classes of finite groups. \textit{D. L. Webb} [Invent. Math. 84, 73--89 (1986; Zbl 0589.55008); J. Pure Appl. Algebra 39, 177--195 (1986; Zbl 0589.16018)] and \textit{D. Webb} and \textit{D. Yao} [\(K\)-Theory 7, No. 6, 575--578 (1993; Zbl 0806.19001)] discovered that the conjecture does not hold for the symmetric group \(S_5\). In this paper, the author shows that the conjectured HTW-decomposition also fails for the solvable group \(\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{F}_3)\). This is proved by comparing the rank \(R(G) = \operatorname{rank} G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) with the rank \(P(G)\) of \(G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) as predicted by the HTW-decomposition. Nevertheless, the author proves a general inequality estimating the number of modular irreducible representations of \(G\) in terms of the rational irreducible representations of \(G\), and as a corollary, it follows that \(P(G) \ge R(G)\) for any \(G\). This gives an explanation of the failure of the HTW-decomposition for \(G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) There are also some positive results: The HTW-decomposition correctly predicts the torsion for \(G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) and the rank of \(G_n(\mathbb{Z}G)\) for \(n \neq 1\).











This page was built for publication: A note on the Hambleton-Taylor-Williams conjecture

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2001407)