A note on the Hambleton-Taylor-Williams conjecture
Let \(G\) be a finite group \(G\) and \(R\) noetherian ring. Consider the \(G\)-theory \(G_i(RG) = K_i(\mathcal{M}(RG))\), \(i \ge 0\), where \(\mathcal{M}(RG)\) is the category of all finitely generated left \(RG\)-modules. \textit{I. Hambleton} et al. [J. Algebra 116, No. 2, 466--470 (1988; Zbl 0658.16019)] conjectured a general formula for the decomposition of \(G_n(RG)\), shown hold for some large classes of finite groups. \textit{D. L. Webb} [Invent. Math. 84, 73--89 (1986; Zbl 0589.55008); J. Pure Appl. Algebra 39, 177--195 (1986; Zbl 0589.16018)] and \textit{D. Webb} and \textit{D. Yao} [\(K\)-Theory 7, No. 6, 575--578 (1993; Zbl 0806.19001)] discovered that the conjecture does not hold for the symmetric group \(S_5\). In this paper, the author shows that the conjectured HTW-decomposition also fails for the solvable group \(\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{F}_3)\). This is proved by comparing the rank \(R(G) = \operatorname{rank} G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) with the rank \(P(G)\) of \(G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) as predicted by the HTW-decomposition. Nevertheless, the author proves a general inequality estimating the number of modular irreducible representations of \(G\) in terms of the rational irreducible representations of \(G\), and as a corollary, it follows that \(P(G) \ge R(G)\) for any \(G\). This gives an explanation of the failure of the HTW-decomposition for \(G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) There are also some positive results: The HTW-decomposition correctly predicts the torsion for \(G_1(\mathbb{Z}G)\) and the rank of \(G_n(\mathbb{Z}G)\) for \(n \neq 1\).
- On a Conjecture of Hammersley
- A note on Hayman’s conjecture
- A note on Halton's conjecture
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3871478
- A simple counterexample to the Hambleton-Taylor-Williams conjecture
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4077650
- On a conjecture of wang and williams
- A note on the Hilali conjecture
- On a conjecture of Hayman
- Remarks on a conjecture of Hartshorne
- G 1 of an Integral Group Ring
- A simple counterexample to the Hambleton-Taylor-Williams conjecture
- Computing Irreducible Representations of Finite Groups
- G-theory of group rings for groups of square-free order
- Grothendieck groups of Abelian group rings
- Grothendieck groups of dihedral and quaternion group rings
- Group ring groups. Volume 1: Orders and generic constructions of units.
- Higher algebraic K-theory: I
- Higher G-theory of nilpotent group rings
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3657912 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 65619 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3552764 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1313469 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3998066 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3212917 (Why is no real title available?)
- Induction theorems for Grothendieck groups and Whitehead groups of finite groups
- K-theory of finite groups and orders. Notes by E. Graham Evans
- On \(G_ n(RG)\) for G a finite nilpotent group
- Quillen G-theory of Abelian group rings
- Representation theory and higher algebraic K-theory
- The Lenstra map on classifying spaces and G-theory of group rings
- The Schur subgroup. I
- Values of Tame Symbols on Division Algebras
This page was built for publication: A note on the Hambleton-Taylor-Williams conjecture
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2001407)