Correction to: ``Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?

DOI10.1007/S00355-021-01378-ZMaRDI QIDQ2125102zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors D. Marc Kilgour, Jean-Charles Grégoire, Angèle M. Foley

Publication date 13 April 2022

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01378-z

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?
• The sensitivity of weight selection on the Condorcet efficiency of weighted scoring rules
• Characterizing best-worst voting systems in the scoring context
• Restricted manipulation in iterative voting: Condorcet efficiency and Borda score
• Borda and the maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1804107
• Corrigendum to: ``Group decisions from individual rankings: the Borda-Condorcet rule
• An exploration of the application of the Banzhaf power index to weighted voting systems
• Ranking-based voting revisited: maximum entropy approach leads to Borda count (and its versions)
• A methodological note on a weighted voting experiment

Cited in

(1)

• Correction: ``Should the democrats move to the left on economic policy?

This page was built for publication: Correction to: ``Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2125102)