The basic reproductive number of Ebola and the effects of public health measures: the cases of Congo and Uganda

Abstract: Despite improved control measures, Ebola remains a serious public health risk in African regions where recurrent outbreaks have been observed since the initial epidemic in 1976. Using epidemic modeling and data from two well-documented Ebola outbreaks (Congo 1995 and Uganda 2000), we estimate the number of secondary cases generated by an index case in the absence of control interventions (

R_{0}

). Our estimate of

R_{0}

is 1.83 (SD 0.06) for Congo (1995) and 1.34 (SD 0.03) for Uganda (2000). We model the course of the outbreaks via an SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infectious-removed) epidemic model that includes a smooth transition in the transmission rate after control interventions are put in place. We perform an uncertainty analysis of the basic reproductive number

R_{0}

to quantify its sensitivity to other disease-related parameters. We also analyze the sensitivity of the final epidemic size to the time interventions begin and provide a distribution for the final epidemic size. The control measures implemented during these two outbreaks (including education and contact tracing followed by quarantine) reduce the final epidemic size by a factor of 2 relative the final size with a two-week delay in their implementation.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(86)

This page was built for publication: The basic reproductive number of Ebola and the effects of public health measures: the cases of Congo and Uganda

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2189263)