Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2453431
DOI10.1007/s00355-012-0691-1zbMath1288.91044OpenAlexW1973311745MaRDI QIDQ2453431
Jean-Christophe Vergnaud, Thibault Gajdos
Publication date: 6 June 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27005/
Related Items
The ex ante aggregation of opinions under uncertainty ⋮ Aggregation of experts' opinions and conditional consensus opinion by the Steiner point ⋮ Smooth aggregation of Bayesian experts ⋮ Separate aggregation of beliefs and values under ambiguity
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Aggregation of multiple prior opinions
- Decision making with imprecise probabilistic information
- Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers' attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates
- Attitude toward imprecise information
- Representation and aggregation of preferences under uncertainty
- Consensus for belief functions and related uncertainty measures
- Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
- On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion
- Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. With comments, and a rejoinder by the authors
- The aggregation of imprecise probabilities
- Consistent Bayesian aggregation
- When does aggregation reduce risk aversion?
- The Opinion Pool
- Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools
- Decision Analysis Expert Use
- Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach
- The ex ante aggregation of opinions under uncertainty
- Generalizing the conjunction rule for aggregating conflicting expert opinions
