Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information

DOI10.1007/S00355-012-0691-1MaRDI QIDQ2453431zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Thibault Gajdos, Jean-Christophe Vergnaud

Publication date 6 June 2014

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27005/

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• Decision making with imprecise probabilistic information
• Cheap talk with multiple experts and uncertain biases
• Choice with imprecise information: An experimental approach
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 773974
• Decision making under uncertainty using imprecise probabilities

Cites work

• Aggregation of multiple prior opinions
• Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers' attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates
• Attitude toward imprecise information
• Combining Expert Judgments: A Bayesian Approach
• Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. With comments, and a rejoinder by the authors
• Consensus for belief functions and related uncertainty measures
• Consistent Bayesian aggregation
• Decision Analysis Expert Use
• Decision making with imprecise probabilistic information
• Generalizing the conjunction rule for aggregating conflicting expert opinions
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3087284 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3092990 (Why is no real title available?)
• Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools
• Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
• On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion
• Representation and aggregation of preferences under uncertainty
• The aggregation of imprecise probabilities
• The ex ante aggregation of opinions under uncertainty
• The Opinion Pool
• When does aggregation reduce risk aversion?

Cited in

(10)

• Aggregation of experts' opinions and conditional consensus opinion by the Steiner point
• Handling uncertainty when getting contradictory advice from experts
• Smooth aggregation of Bayesian experts
• The ex ante aggregation of opinions under uncertainty
• Separate aggregation of beliefs and values under ambiguity
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2233231 (Why is no real title available?)
• Aggregating inconclusive data sets
• Bayesian social aggregation with almost-objective uncertainty
• Cautiousness when experts disagree
• Strategy-proof aggregation of approximate and imprecise judgments

This page was built for publication: Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2453431)