On various confidence intervals post-model-selection

From MaRDI portal
Publication:254446

DOI10.1214/14-STS507zbMATH Open1332.62154arXiv1401.2267OpenAlexW1933929712MaRDI QIDQ254446FDOQ254446


Authors: Hannes Leeb, Benedikt M. Pötscher, Karl Ewald Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 8 March 2016

Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We compare several confidence intervals after model selection in the setting recently studied by Berk et al. [Ann. Statist. 41 (2013) 802-837], where the goal is to cover not the true parameter but a certain nonstandard quantity of interest that depends on the selected model. In particular, we compare the PoSI-intervals that are proposed in that reference with the "naive" confidence interval, which is constructed as if the selected model were correct and fixed a priori (thus ignoring the presence of model selection). Overall, we find that the actual coverage probabilities of all these intervals deviate only moderately from the desired nominal coverage probability. This finding is in stark contrast to several papers in the existing literature, where the goal is to cover the true parameter.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2267




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (24)





This page was built for publication: On various confidence intervals post-model-selection

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q254446)