How Bayesian confirmation theory handles the paradox of the ravens
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2997006
DOI10.1007/978-90-481-3615-5_11zbMATH Open1217.60005OpenAlexW2120414033MaRDI QIDQ2997006FDOQ2997006
Authors: Branden Fitelson, James Hawthorne
Publication date: 6 May 2011
Published in: The Place of Probability in Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3615-5_11
Recommendations
- Hempel's Raven Paradox: A Lacuna in the Standard Bayesian Solution
- The ``raven paradox in the light of probability theory
- Does the Bayesian solution to the paradox of confirmation really support Bayesianism?
- Bayesianism, Ravens, and Evidential Relevance
- Hemple's raven paradox: defusing an alleged lacuna in the standard Bayesian solution
Cited In (15)
- An impossibility theorem for amalgamating evidence
- Does the Bayesian solution to the paradox of confirmation really support Bayesianism?
- Bayesianism, Ravens, and Evidential Relevance
- Resolving the Raven Paradox: Simple Random Sampling, Stratified Random Sampling, and Inference to Best Explanation
- Hempel's Raven Paradox: A Lacuna in the Standard Bayesian Solution
- Confirmation and the ordinal equivalence thesis
- A synthesis of Hempelian and hypothetico-deductive confirmation
- Revamping hypothetico-deductivism: A dialectic account of confirmation
- The raven paradox revisited in terms of random variables
- On the truth-conduciveness of coherence
- The Selective Confirmation Answer to the Paradox of the Ravens
- The ``raven paradox in the light of probability theory
- Goodman's ``new riddle
- Once more to dissolve the ravens
- A decision procedure for probability calculus with applications
This page was built for publication: How Bayesian confirmation theory handles the paradox of the ravens
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2997006)