Different paths to consensus? The impact of need for closure on model-supported group conflict management
From MaRDI portal
Publication:321060
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.056zbMath1346.91044OpenAlexW1040508605MaRDI QIDQ321060
L. Alberto Franco, Hubert Korzilius, Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette
Publication date: 7 October 2016
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/18942
Related Items (7)
Editorial: Behavioural operational research: returning to the roots of the OR profession ⋮ Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations ⋮ On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: a comparison of problem structuring methods supported and self-organized workshops ⋮ Facets of trust in simulation studies ⋮ Taking stock of behavioural OR: a review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus ⋮ Fostering long-term care planning in practice: extending objectives and advancing stochastic treatment within location-allocation modelling ⋮ Cognitive change and consensus forming in facilitated modelling: a comparison of experienced and observed outcomes
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Facilitated modelling in operational research
- Understanding problem structuring methods interventions
- Structuring resource allocation decisions: a framework for building multi-criteria portfolio models with area-grouped options
- On evaluating the performance of `wide-band' GDSS's
- Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives
- A career choice problem: an example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments.
- On the importance of behavioral operational research: the case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems
- Value-Focused Brainstorming
- Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring
This page was built for publication: Different paths to consensus? The impact of need for closure on model-supported group conflict management