The three-box paradox revisited
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3435149
Abstract: The classical three-box paradox of Kirkpatrick [J. Phys. A 36 4891 (2003)] is compared to the original quantum Three-Box paradox of Aharonov and Vaidman [J. Phys. A 24 2315 (1991)]. It is argued that the quantum Three-Box experiment is a "quantum paradox" in the sense that it is an example of a classical task which cannot be accomplished using classical means, but can be accomplished using quantum devices. It is shown that Kirkpatrick's card game is analogous to a different game with a particle in three boxes which does not contain paradoxical features.
Recommendations
- Reply to ‘The three-box paradox revisited’ by T Ravon and L Vaidman
- Classical three-box paradox
- On the two-box paradox
- Measurements, disturbances and the quantum three box paradox
- Karpińska's paradox in dimension 3
- Three-box paradox and `Cheshire cat grin': the case of spin-1 atoms
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 953301
- The von Neumann triple point paradox
Cited in
(21)- Pedagogical review of quantum measurement theory with an emphasis on weak measurements
- Measurements, disturbances and the quantum three box paradox
- Interpreting weak value amplification with a toy realist model
- What is a quantum-mechanical ``weak value the value of?
- On Weak Values and Feynman's Blind Alley
- Classical three-box paradox
- Weak values are quantum: you can bet on it
- Weak measurements measure probability amplitudes (and very little else)
- Reply to ‘The three-box paradox revisited’ by T Ravon and L Vaidman
- Quantum Cheshire cats and their elements of reality
- A quasi-current representation for information needs inspired by two-state vector formalism
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2233198 (Why is no real title available?)
- Weak value tomography of strong quantum measurements
- Geometric description of modular and weak values in discrete quantum systems using the Majorana representation
- Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Measurements
- Path probabilities for consecutive measurements, and certain ``quantum paradoxes
- Experimental implementations of quantum paradoxes
- Path integrals, the ABL rule and the three-box paradox
- Experimental realization of the quantum box problem
- Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes are proofs of contextuality
- Feynman-path analysis of Hardy's paradox: measurements and the uncertainty principle
This page was built for publication: The three-box paradox revisited
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3435149)