Strategies for securing evidence through model criticism

DOI10.1007/S13194-011-0022-XzbMath1267.03028OpenAlexW2006102230MaRDI QIDQ351161

Kent W. Staley

Publication date: 11 July 2013

Published in: European Journal for Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-011-0022-x

zbMATH Keywords

evidencerobustnesssecurityjustificationstatistical modelserror-statisticsmis-specification testing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundational topics in statistics (62A99) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Related Items (1)

The objectivity of subjective Bayesianism

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Error-statistical elimination of alternative hypotheses
• Did Pearson reject the Neyman-Pearson philosophy of statistics!
• Local sensitivity and diagnostic tests
• Some Thoughts on Statistical Inference
• The Influence Curve and Its Role in Robust Estimation
• Simon Newcomb, Percy Daniell, and the History of Robust Estimation 1885-1920
• Principles of Statistical Inference
• Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
• Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter
• A General Qualitative Definition of Robustness
• The problem of inductive inference
• Robust Statistics

This page was built for publication: Strategies for securing evidence through model criticism