Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3524935
DOI10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25zbMATH Open1148.68503OpenAlexW1572934910MaRDI QIDQ3524935FDOQ3524935
Authors: Claudette Cayrol, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex 
Publication date: 16 September 2008
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_25
Recommendations
Cites Work
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (11)
- A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks: grounded semantics and principles
- Partial semantics of argumentation: basic properties and empirical
- Towards an Extensible Argumentation System
- Arguing with valued preference relations
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
- On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation
- Partial semantics of argumentation
This page was built for publication: Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3524935)
