Attitudes and preferences: approaches to representing decision maker desires

DOI10.1016/j.amc.2011.11.102zbMath1241.91039OpenAlexW2082511275MaRDI QIDQ428053

Sean G. Bernath Walker, Keith William Hipel, Takehiro Inohara

Publication date: 19 June 2012

Published in: Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.11.102

zbMATH Keywords

preferencesattitudesgraph model for conflict resolution

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Related Items (5)

A Bayesian decision model based on expected utility and uncertainty risk ⋮ Similarities, differences, and preservation of efficiencies, with application to attitude analysis, within the graph model for conflict resolution ⋮ Preference prediction analysis based on graph model for environmental governance conflict ⋮ Matrix representation of consensus and dissent stabilities in the graph model for conflict resolution ⋮ Mixed stabilities for analyzing opponents' heterogeneous behavior within the graph model for conflict resolution

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Solution concepts in hypergames
• Relational Nash equilibrium and interrelationships among relational and rational equilibrium concepts
• Multiple levels of preference in interactive strategic decisions
• The graph model for conflicts
• The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management
• The graph model for conflict resolution with information-gap uncertainty in preferences.
• Trust and cooperation from a fuzzy perspective
• Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts
• Cooperation in conflict analysis
• Non-cooperative games
• Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution
• Equilibrium points in n -person games

This page was built for publication: Attitudes and preferences: approaches to representing decision maker desires