Maker–Breaker percolation games I: crossing grids

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:4993258)



Abstract: Motivated by problems in percolation theory, we study the following 2-player positional game. Let Lambdamimesn be a rectangular grid-graph with m vertices in each row and n vertices in each column. Two players, Maker and Breaker, play in alternating turns. On each of her turns, Maker claims p (as-yet unclaimed) edges of the board Lambdamimesn, while on each of his turns Breaker claims q (as-yet unclaimed) edges of the board and destroys them. Maker wins the game if she manages to claim all the edges of a crossing path joining the left-hand side of the board to its right-hand side, otherwise Breaker wins. We call this game the (p,q)-crossing game on Lambdamimesn. Given m,ninmathbbN, for which pairs (p,q) does Maker have a winning strategy for the (p,q)-crossing game on Lambdamimesn? The (1,1)-case corresponds exactly to the popular game of Bridg-it, which is well understood due to it being a special case of the older Shannon switching game. In this paper, we study the general (p,q)-case. Our main result is to establish the following transition: If pgeqslant2q, then Maker wins the game on arbitrarily long versions of the narrowest board possible, i.e. Maker has a winning strategy for the (2q,q)-crossing game on Lambdamimes(q+1) for any minmathbbN; if pleqslant2q1, then for every width n of the board, Breaker has a winning strategy for the (p,q)-crossing game on Lambdamimesn for all sufficiently large board-lengths m. Our winning strategies in both cases adapt more generally to other grids and crossing games. In addition we pose many new questions and problems.











This page was built for publication: Maker–Breaker percolation games I: crossing grids

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4993258)