Performance of the smallest-variance-first rule in appointment sequencing

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5031672

DOI10.1287/OPRE.2020.2025zbMATH Open1482.90090arXiv1812.01467OpenAlexW3124064250MaRDI QIDQ5031672FDOQ5031672


Authors: Madelon A. de Kemp, Neil Olver, M. R. H. Mandjes Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 16 February 2022

Published in: Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A classical problem in appointment scheduling, with applications in health care, concerns the determination of the patients' arrival times that minimize a cost function that is a weighted sum of mean waiting times and mean idle times. One aspect of this problem is the sequencing problem, which focuses on ordering the patients. We assess the performance of the smallest-variance-first (SVF) rule, which sequences patients in order of increasing variance of their service durations. While it was known that SVF is not always optimal, it has been widely observed that it performs well in practice and simulation. We provide a theoretical justification for this observation by proving, in various settings, quantitative worst-case bounds on the ratio between the cost incurred by the SVF rule and the minimum attainable cost. We also show that, in great generality, SVF is asymptotically optimal, i.e., the ratio approaches 1 as the number of patients grows large. While evaluating policies by considering an approximation ratio is a standard approach in many algorithmic settings, our results appear to be the first of this type in the appointment scheduling literature.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01467




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: Performance of the smallest-variance-first rule in appointment sequencing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5031672)