A Dutch book against sleeping beauties who are evidential decision theorists

DOI10.1007/S11229-015-0691-7MaRDI QIDQ514611zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Vincent Conitzer

Publication date 9 March 2017

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.03560

zbMATH Keywords

Dutch booksevidential decision theorysleeping beauty problemself-locating beliefs

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Abstract: In the context of the Sleeping Beauty problem, it has been argued that so-called "halfers" can avoid Dutch book arguments by adopting evidential decision theory. I introduce a Dutch book for a variant of the Sleeping Beauty problem and argue that evidential decision theorists fall prey to it, whether they are halfers or thirders. The argument crucially requires that an action can provide evidence for what the agent would do not only at other decision points where she has exactly the same information, but also at decision points where she has different but "symmetric" information.

Recommendations

• Dutch book arguments and imprecise probabilities
• Dutch book against some `objective' priors
• On the expected utility objection to the Dutch book argument for probabilism
• The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument
• Dutch Books Arguments and Learning in a Nonexpected Utility Framework
• Hidden assumptions in the Dutch Book argument
• Objectifying subjective probabilities: Dutch book arguments for principles of direct inference
• The vulnerability of the transferable belief model to Dutch books

Cites work

• Belief update across fission
• Diachronic Dutch books and Sleeping Beauty
• Lost memories and useless coins: revisiting the absentminded driver
• Sleeping Beauty and self-location: a hybrid model

Cited in

(9)

• The vulnerability of the transferable belief model to Dutch books
• Hidden assumptions in the Dutch Book argument
• Sleeping Beauty, evidential support and indexical knowledge: reply to Horgan
• Dutch book against some `objective' priors
• Diachronic Dutch books and Sleeping Beauty
• The Sleeping Beauty controversy
• A Dutch book for CDT thirders
• Bayesian beauty
• Can rational choice guide us to correct \textit{de se} beliefs?

This page was built for publication: A Dutch book against sleeping beauties who are evidential decision theorists

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q514611)