Hidden assumptions in the Dutch Book argument
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1371365
DOI10.1023/A:1004996226545zbMATH Open0879.90007MaRDI QIDQ1371365FDOQ1371365
Authors: C. Waidacher
Publication date: 28 October 1997
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument
- Dutch book arguments and imprecise probabilities
- Dutch books, coherence, and logical consistency
- Dutch Books Arguments and Learning in a Nonexpected Utility Framework
- A Dutch book against sleeping beauties who are evidential decision theorists
- Dutch book against some `objective' priors
- The vulnerability of the transferable belief model to Dutch books
- Avoiding Dutch books despite inconsistent credences
Cited In (10)
- Pitfalls of amateur regression: The Dutch New Herring controversies
- The vulnerability of the transferable belief model to Dutch books
- Dutch book against some `objective' priors
- On the expected utility objection to the Dutch book argument for probabilism
- The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument
- After Dutch books
- The main two arguments for probabilism are flawed
- The stubborn non-probabilist -- ``negation incoherence and a new way to block the Dutch book argument
- A Dutch book against sleeping beauties who are evidential decision theorists
- On some aspects of decision theory under uncertainty: rationality, price-probabilities and the Dutch book argument
This page was built for publication: Hidden assumptions in the Dutch Book argument
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1371365)