The main two arguments for probabilism are flawed

DOI10.1007/S11229-013-0286-0MaRDI QIDQ484928zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Luigi Secchi

Publication date 8 January 2015

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0286-0

zbMATH Keywords

representation theoremsDutch Book argumentprobabilism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Recommendations

• Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?
• After Dutch books
• What are degrees of belief?
• Hidden assumptions in the Dutch Book argument
• The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3137856 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 46364 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3087284 (Why is no real title available?)
• Conditional Expected Utility
• Fair bets and inductive probabilities

Cited in

(1)

• Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?

This page was built for publication: The main two arguments for probabilism are flawed

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484928)