The main two arguments for probabilism are flawed

DOI10.1007/S11229-013-0286-0zbMATH Open1302.03033OpenAlexW2029328270MaRDI QIDQ484928FDOQ484928

Authors: Luigi Secchi 

Publication date: 8 January 2015

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0286-0

Recommendations

• Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?
• After Dutch books
• What are degrees of belief?
• Hidden assumptions in the Dutch Book argument
• The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument

zbMATH Keywords

representation theoremsDutch Book argumentprobabilism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Fair bets and inductive probabilities
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Conditional Expected Utility

Cited In (1)

• Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?

This page was built for publication: The main two arguments for probabilism are flawed

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484928)