The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2462672
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(16)- On the proximity of the logical and `Objective Bayesian' interpretations of probability
- The vulnerability of the transferable belief model to Dutch books
- Hidden assumptions in the Dutch Book argument
- The stubborn non-probabilist -- ``negation incoherence and a new way to block the Dutch book argument
- The interference problem for the betting interpretation of degrees of belief
- Logic with numbers
- Dutch books, coherence, and logical consistency
- Imprecise probabilities and unstable betting behaviour
- The main two arguments for probabilism are flawed
- On the expected utility objection to the Dutch book argument for probabilism
- A Dutch book against sleeping beauties who are evidential decision theorists
- Dutch book arguments and imprecise probabilities
- After Dutch books
- Zero-probability and coherent betting: a logical point of view
- Objective Bayesianism, Bayesian conditionalisation and voluntarism
- Pitfalls of amateur regression: The Dutch New Herring controversies
This page was built for publication: The insufficiency of the Dutch Book argument
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2462672)