Robust Decentralized Secondary Frequency Control in Power Systems: Merits and Tradeoffs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5211151

DOI10.1109/TAC.2018.2884650zbMATH Open1482.93267arXiv1711.07332WikidataQ106730150 ScholiaQ106730150MaRDI QIDQ5211151FDOQ5211151


Authors: Yan Jiang, Changhong Zhao, Enrique Mallada, Florian Dörfler, Erik R. A. Weitenberg, C. De Persis Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 28 January 2020

Published in: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Frequency restoration in power systems is conventionally performed by broadcasting a centralized signal to local controllers. As a result of the energy transition, technological advances, and the scientific interest in distributed control and optimization methods, a plethora of distributed frequency control strategies have been proposed recently that rely on communication amongst local controllers. In this paper we propose a fully decentralized leaky integral controller for frequency restoration that is derived from a classic lag element. We study steady-state, asymptotic optimality, nominal stability, input-to-state stability, noise rejection, transient performance, and robustness properties of this controller in closed loop with a nonlinear and multivariable power system model. We demonstrate that the leaky integral controller can strike an acceptable trade-off between performance and robustness as well as between asymptotic disturbance rejection and transient convergence rate by tuning its DC gain and time constant. We compare our findings to conventional decentralized integral control and distributed-averaging-based integral control in theory and simulations.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07332







Cited In (12)





This page was built for publication: Robust Decentralized Secondary Frequency Control in Power Systems: Merits and Tradeoffs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5211151)