Fairness, spite, and intentions: testing different motives behind punishment in a prisoners' dilemma game
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:694919)
Recommendations
- Why punish? Norms and revenge in an experimental game
- Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
- Selfish punishers. An experimental investigation of designated punishment behavior in public goods
- Fairness, public good, and emotional aspects of punishment behavior
- Care and anger motives in social dilemmas
Cites work
- A theory of sequential reciprocity
- An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender-receiver game
- Do non-strategic sanctions obey the law of demand? The demand for punishment in the voluntary contribution mechanism
- Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1907684 (Why is no real title available?)
- Testing theories of fairness-intentions matter
Cited in
(10)- McCockerel measuring individual punishment and reciprocity in a simple value-laden dilemma game
- Reacting to unfairness: group identity and dishonest behavior
- Perceived motives and reciprocity
- The intuition of punishment: a study of fairness preferences and cognitive ability
- Different carrots and different sticks: Do we reward and punish differently than we approve and disapprove?
- Why punish? Norms and revenge in an experimental game
- Inequality and procedural justice in social dilemmas
- Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
- The motive matters: experimental evidence on the expressive function of punishment
- Prudence, justice, benevolence, and sex: Evidence from similar bargaining games
This page was built for publication: Fairness, spite, and intentions: testing different motives behind punishment in a prisoners' dilemma game
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q694919)
