Formal and informal model selection with incomplete data

From MaRDI portal
Publication:900458

DOI10.1214/07-STS253zbMATH Open1327.62027arXiv0808.3587OpenAlexW3101527867MaRDI QIDQ900458FDOQ900458


Authors: Geert Verbeke, Caroline Beunckens, Geert Molenberghs Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 22 December 2015

Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Model selection and assessment with incomplete data pose challenges in addition to the ones encountered with complete data. There are two main reasons for this. First, many models describe characteristics of the complete data, in spite of the fact that only an incomplete subset is observed. Direct comparison between model and data is then less than straightforward. Second, many commonly used models are more sensitive to assumptions than in the complete-data situation and some of their properties vanish when they are fitted to incomplete, unbalanced data. These and other issues are brought forward using two key examples, one of a continuous and one of a categorical nature. We argue that model assessment ought to consist of two parts: (i) assessment of a model's fit to the observed data and (ii) assessment of the sensitivity of inferences to unverifiable assumptions, that is, to how a model described the unobserved data given the observed ones.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3587




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Formal and informal model selection with incomplete data

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q900458)