Assumptions of IV methods for observational epidemiology
From MaRDI portal
Publication:903300
DOI10.1214/09-STS316zbMATH Open1328.62587arXiv1011.0595OpenAlexW2949540592MaRDI QIDQ903300FDOQ903300
Authors: Vanessa Didelez, Sha Meng, Nuala A. Sheehan
Publication date: 5 January 2016
Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Instrumental variable (IV) methods are becoming increasingly popular as they seem to offer the only viable way to overcome the problem of unobserved confounding in observational studies. However, some attention has to be paid to the details, as not all such methods target the same causal parameters and some rely on more restrictive parametric assumptions than others. We therefore discuss and contrast the most common IV approaches with relevance to typical applications in observational epidemiology. Further, we illustrate and compare the asymptotic bias of these IV estimators when underlying assumptions are violated in a numerical study. One of our conclusions is that all IV methods encounter problems in the presence of effect modification by unobserved confounders. Since this can never be ruled out for sure, we recommend that practical applications of IV estimators be accompanied routinely by a sensitivity analysis.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0595
Recommendations
- IV estimation without distributional assumptions
- Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies
- A flexible instrumental variable approach
- Instrumental variable estimators for binary outcomes
- Think globally, act globally: an epidemiologist's perspective on instrumental variable estimation
Point estimation (62F10) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical epidemiology (92C60)
Cites Work
- Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
- Causal inference from graphical models
- Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data.
- Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment Intensity
- Influence Diagrams for Causal Modelling and Inference
- Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization
- Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems
- Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference
- Estimation of treatment effects in randomised trials with non-compliance and a dichotomous outcome using structural mean models
- Causal diagrams for empirical research
- Causal Inference with Generalized Structural Mean Models
- Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models
- Causal Inference Without Counterfactuals
- The Fitting of Straight Lines if Both Variables are Subject to Error
- Instrumental variable estimators for binary outcomes
- Comparison of causal effect estimators under exposure misclassification
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Correcting instrumental variables estimators for systematic measurement error
Cited In (25)
- A flexible instrumental variable approach
- Think globally, act globally: an epidemiologist's perspective on instrumental variable estimation
- On instrumental variables estimation of causal odds ratios
- Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies
- Double penalized regularization estimation for partially linear instrumental variable models with ultrahigh dimensional instrumental variables
- Instrumental variable analysis for cost outcome: Application to the effect of primary care visit on medical cost among low‐income adults
- IV estimation without distributional assumptions
- On semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of average treatment effects through data fusion
- Estimating peer effects in longitudinal dyadic data using instrumental variables
- A note on the control function approach with an instrumental variable and a binary outcome
- Estimation of the number needed to treat, the number needed to be exposed, and the exposure impact number with instrumental variables
- Sensitivity analysis of G-estimators to invalid instrumental variables
- Integrating Mendelian randomization with causal mediation analyses for characterizing direct and indirect exposure-to-outcome effects
- Approaches to the estimation of the local average treatment effect in a regression discontinuity design
- Mediation analysis with case-control sampling: identification and estimation in the presence of a binary mediator
- From statistical to causal learning
- Estimating and contextualizing the attenuation of odds ratios due to non collapsibility
- Partial Identification of the Average Treatment Effect Using Instrumental Variables: Review of Methods for Binary Instruments, Treatments, and Outcomes
- Regularization statistical inferences for partially linear models with high dimensional endogenous covariates
- The GENIUS approach to robust Mendelian randomization inference
- Half-trek criterion for generic identifiability of linear structural equation models
- Exact parametric causal mediation analysis for a binary outcome with a binary mediator
- Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers
- Instrumental variable estimation with the R package \texttt{ivtools}
- Instrumental variable estimators for binary outcomes
This page was built for publication: Assumptions of IV methods for observational epidemiology
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q903300)