Why bother with syntax?
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: This short note discusses the role of syntax vs. semantics and the interplay between logic, philosophy, and language in computer science and game theory.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A logic for reasoning about probabilities
- A necessary and sufficient epistemic condition for playing backward induction
- Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality
- Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning
- Characterizing common priors in the form of posteriors
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2046116 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 795590 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5497554 (Why is no real title available?)
- Interactive epistemology. I: Knowledge
- Reasoning about knowledge and probability
- Reasoning about knowledge of unawareness revisited
- Set-theoretic completeness for epistemic and conditional logic
- Some extensions of a claim of Aumann in an axiomatic model of knowledge
- The hierarchical approach to modeling knowledge and common knowledge
- Topology-free typology of beliefs
This page was built for publication: Why bother with syntax?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3299838)