Why safety doesn't save closure
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(23)- The knower paradox and epistemic closure
- Safety, closure, and the flow of information
- Epistemic closure and epistemic logic. I: Relevant alternatives and subjunctivism
- Transmission arguments against knowledge closure are still fallacious
- Towards closure on closure
- Epistemic closure under deductive inference: what is it and can we afford it?
- Safety, sensitivity and differential support
- Williamson, closure, and KK
- Safety, domination, and differential support
- Comments on Holliday
- Stakes sensitivity and transformative experience
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2097000 (Why is no real title available?)
- When does epistemic closure fail?
- On synchronic dogmatism
- Knowing by way of tracking and epistemic closure
- Knowledge-to-fact arguments (bootstrapping, closure, paradox and KK)
- Knowledge is closed under analytic content
- Practical reasoning and degrees of outright belief
- Getting a little closure for closure
- Losing confidence in luminosity
- How to safely close a discussion
- In defense of sensitivity
- A strategy for assessing closure
This page was built for publication: Why safety doesn't save closure
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q408332)