Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis. With comments by Dennis V. Lindley, Thomas A. Louis and David Hinkley and a rejoinder by the authors

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 02:25, 1 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:1596132

DOI10.1214/ss/1030037904zbMath0955.62527OpenAlexW1560253801MaRDI QIDQ1596132

Y. Wang, James O. Berger, Benzion Boukai

Publication date: 7 February 2001

Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1030037904




Related Items (38)

Statistical evidence and sample size determination for Bayesian hypothesis testingRejection odds and rejection ratios: a proposal for statistical practice in testing hypothesesError probabilities in default Bayesian hypothesis testingTesting un-separated hypotheses by estimating a distanceMultiple testing of response rates with a control: A Bayesian stepwise approachPublication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery RateA SUITABLE BAYESIAN APPROACH IN TESTING POINT NULL HYPOTHESIS: SOME EXAMPLES REVISITEDStatistics between inductive logic and empirical scienceFrequentist-Bayesian Monte Carlo testingConfidence-credible intervalsBayes optimal sequential trial designsBalancing producer and consumer risks in optimal attribute testing: a unified Bayesian/frequentist designThe case of the Jeffreys-Lindley-paradox as a Bayes-frequentist compromise: a perspective based on the Rao-Lovric-theoremThe evidence interval and the Bayesian evidence value: On a unified theory for Bayesian hypothesis testing and interval estimationNeyman–Pearson lemma for Bayes factorsHarold Jeffreys's \textit{Theory of probability} revisitedThe \(2\times2\) table: A discussion from a Bayesian viewpoint.Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).Statistical properties of the fuzzy \(p\)-valueA note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing\(\varepsilon\)-contaminated priors in testing point null hypothesis: A procedure to determine the prior probabilityBayesian model selection in the \(\mathcal{M}\)-open setting -- approximate posterior inference and subsampling for efficient large-scale leave-one-out cross-validation via the difference estimator\(\varepsilon\)-contaminated priors in contingency tablesPower analysis and type I and type II error rates of Bayesian nonparametric two-sample tests for location-shifts based on the Bayes factor under Cauchy priorsFrequentist-Bayesian Monte Carlo test for mean vectors in high dimensionA SHORT NOTE ON REPEATED SIGNIFICANCE TESTS AND THE UNIFIED BAYESIAN-FREQUENTIST MEASUREOn the correspondence between frequentist and Bayesian testsThe Methods of Sequential Analysis of Bayesian Type for the Multiple Testing ProblemAlternative Bayes factors: Sample size determination and discriminatory power assessmentSimple ancillariesA conversation with James O. BergerComparison of testing procedures utilizingP-values and Bayes factors in some common situations\(r\times s\) tables from a Bayesian viewpointBayesian Versus Frequentist Approach of the Frailty Cox Model, Application to Calf GastroenteritisA review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportionAn Objective Bayesian Approach to Multistage Hypothesis TestingAnalysis of type I and II error rates of Bayesian and frequentist parametric and nonparametric two-sample hypothesis tests under preliminary assessment of normalityAdvantages of Variance Stabilization



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis. With comments by Dennis V. Lindley, Thomas A. Louis and David Hinkley and a rejoinder by the authors