A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3597112

DOI10.1177/0962280206079046zbMath1156.62048OpenAlexW2032136732WikidataQ36910192 ScholiaQ36910192MaRDI QIDQ3597112

Alessio Farcomeni

Publication date: 9 February 2009

Published in: Statistical Methods in Medical Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280206079046




Related Items

The role of the p-value in the multitesting problemOn correlated \(z\)-values distribution in hypothesis testingA modification of MaxT procedure using spurious correlationsA Bayesian decision-theoretic approach to logically-consistent hypothesis testingAccelerated Spike Resampling for Accurate Multiple Testing ControlsCoherent Hypothesis TestingUnlucky Number 13? Manipulating Evidence Subject to SnoopingMultiple test functions and adjusted \(p\)-values for test statistics with discrete distributionsEvaluations of FDR-controlling procedures in multiple hypothesis testingFalse discovery rates in somatic mutation studies of cancerF-distribution calibrated empirical likelihood ratio tests for multiple hypothesis testingA conservative estimator for the proportion of false nulls based on Dvoretzky, Kiefer and Wolfowitz inequalityEvaluation of false discovery rate and power via sample size in microarray studiesError rates for multivariate outlier detectionSplit-door criterion: identification of causal effects through auxiliary outcomesGeneralized Augmentation to Control the False Discovery Exceedance in Multiple Testingk-FWER Control without p -value Adjustment, with Application to Detection of Genetic Determinants of Multiple Sclerosis in Italian TwinsFalse discovery variance reduction in large scale simultaneous hypothesis testsAssessing the pattern of covariance matrices via an augmentation multiple testing procedureLOPSIDED REASONING ON LOPSIDED TESTS AND MULTIPLE COMPARISONSTesting for equality of ordered eigenvectors of two multivariate normal populationsRobust distances for outlier-free goodness-of-fit testingFDR Control with Pseudo‐Gatekeeping Based on a Possibly Data Driven Order of the Hypotheses


Uses Software


Cites Work