On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2268109
DOI10.1016/j.geb.2009.09.003zbMath1200.91062OpenAlexW2133002802WikidataQ56429458 ScholiaQ56429458MaRDI QIDQ2268109
Gary Charness, Edi Karni, Dan Levin
Publication date: 10 March 2010
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49905
Related Items (11)
Role of collective information in networks of quantum operating agents ⋮ Information processing by networks of quantum decision makers ⋮ Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy ⋮ Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity ⋮ Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement ⋮ Does truth win when teams reason strategically? ⋮ Does consultation improve decision-making? ⋮ On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda ⋮ Good decision vs. good results: outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents ⋮ Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests? ⋮ Probability interference in expected utility theory
Cites Work
- Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size
- The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. (With commentaries)
- On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda
- Individual and group decision making under risk: An experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance
- Large Stakes and Big Mistakes
- Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
- Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
This page was built for publication: On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda
