Possibility to agree on disagree from quantum information and decision making

DOI10.1016/j.jmp.2014.09.003zbMath1310.91053OpenAlexW2009140987MaRDI QIDQ2343776

Irina Basieva, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Publication date: 6 May 2015

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2014.09.003

zbMATH Keywords

common knowledgequantum probabilityquantum measurement theoryprojection postulateAumann theoremquantum decision makingagree on disagree

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Measurement theory in the social and behavioral sciences (91C05) Quantum information, communication, networks (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P45)

Related Items (15)

Quantum field inspired model of decision making: asymptotic stabilization of belief state via interaction with surrounding mental environment ⋮ Note on transmitted complexity for quantum dynamical systems ⋮ A model of adaptive decision-making from representation of information environment by quantum fields ⋮ A dynamical approach to compatible and incompatible questions ⋮ Exploring the relations between quantum-like Bayesian networks and decision-making tasks with regard to face stimuli ⋮ Nondistributivity of human logic and violation of response replicability effect in cognitive psychology ⋮ Note on entropies for quantum dynamical systems ⋮ From axiomatics of quantum probability to modelling geological uncertainty and management of intelligent hydrocarbon reservoirs with the theory of open quantum systems ⋮ On Complexity for Open System Dynamics ⋮ A proposal to extend expected utility in a quantum probabilistic framework ⋮ Quantum like modeling of decision making: quantifying uncertainty with the aid of Heisenberg-Robertson inequality ⋮ Quantum-like model of subjective expected utility ⋮ Quantum version of Aumann's approach to common knowledge: sufficient conditions of impossibility to agree on disagree ⋮ On extension of joint distribution functions on quantum logics ⋮ The triple-store experiment: a first simultaneous test of classical and quantum probabilities in choice over menus

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Selectivity in probabilistic causality: where psychology runs into quantum physics
• Interference and inequality in quantum decision theory
• The relationship between quantum and classical correlation in games
• Quantum mechanics, interference, and the brain
• Type indeterminacy: A model of the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-man
• Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: The use of probability interference and other concepts
• Empirical comparison of Markov and quantum models of decision making
• Common knowledge, communication, and convergence of beliefs
• Common knowledge with probability 1
• Approximating common knowledge with common beliefs
• Agreeing to disagree
• Quantum-like model of brain's functioning: decision making from decoherence
• Quantum-like model of diauxie in \textit{Escherichia coli}: operational description of precultivation effect
• Information dynamics in cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena.
• Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality
• Quantum-like generalization of the Bayesian updating scheme for objective and subjective mental uncertainties
• Order effects in sequential measurements of non-commuting psychological observables
• Quantum dynamics of human decision-making
• On Application of Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad Equation in Cognitive Psychology
• Ubiquitous Quantum Structure
• Common Knowledge, Consensus, and Aggregate Information
• Operationally Invariant Information in Quantum Measurements
• On Quantum-Like Probabilistic Structure of Mental Information
• Young's experiment and the finiteness of information
• The Quantum Black-Scholes Equation
• Delirium Quantum Or, where I will take quantum mechanics if it will let me

This page was built for publication: Possibility to agree on disagree from quantum information and decision making