A Plea for Accuracy

DOI10.1080/11663081.1998.10510943MaRDI QIDQ4236066zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sven Ove Hansson, Hans Rott

Publication date 29 November 1999

Published in Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1998.10510943

zbMATH Keywords

belief changecontractionrevisiontheory change

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• How Not to Change the Theory of Theory Change: A Reply to Tennant
• Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics
• On having bad contractions, or: no room for recovery

Cites work

• Belief contraction without recovery
• Changes of disjunctively closed bases
• Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Towards a Computational Approach
• How Not to Change the Theory of Theory Change: A Reply to Tennant
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1333630 (Why is no real title available?)
• On having bad contractions, or: no room for recovery
• On probabilistic representation of non-probabilistic belief revision
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• On the logic of theory change: safe contraction
• On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change
• Theory contraction and base contraction unified
• Theory contraction through base contraction

Cited in

(5)

• On an error in Grove's proof
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1180150 (Why is no real title available?)
• Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics
• How Not to Change the Theory of Theory Change: A Reply to Tennant
• A correction to ``Nonmonotonic inconsistency

This page was built for publication: A Plea for Accuracy

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4236066)