Competing allocation principles: time for compromise?

DOI10.1007/S11238-011-9289-9MaRDI QIDQ1934268zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Lars Schwettmann

Publication date 28 January 2013

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9289-9

zbMATH Keywords

efficiencyneedsequalityresponsibilityquestionnaireallocation rulesdistributive justice

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)

Recommendations

• Mixed rules in multi-issue allocation situations
• On best-of-both-worlds fair-share allocations
• Incentive compatibility and competitive allocations
• Acceptable and Walrasian allocations
• On the optimality of not allocating
• Reallocation with priorities and minimal envy mechanisms
• Uniform allocation and reallocation revisited

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3694871 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5588549 (Why is no real title available?)
• Envy freeness in experimental fair division problems
• Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle
• Evaluation via extended orderings: empirical findings from Western and Eastern Europe
• On the relative strengths of altruism and fairness
• Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem
• Social choice and individual values
• The bargaining problem

Cited in

(3)

• Need, equity, and accountability. Evidence on third-party distribution decisions from a vignette study
• Thresholds, productivity, and context: an experimental study on determinants of distributive behaviour
• Reconciling cost-effectiveness with the rule of rescue: the institutional division of moral labour

This page was built for publication: Competing allocation principles: time for compromise?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1934268)