Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_9MaRDI QIDQ6587910zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Saul Gebhardt, Dragan Doder

Publication date 15 August 2024

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_9

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationDung's semanticspreferences

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Recommendations

• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Preference in Abstract Argumentation
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks

Cites work

• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4166925 (Why is no real title available?)
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Preference in Abstract Argumentation
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6587910)