Valuations of semirings (Q1742998)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Valuations of semirings
    scientific article

      Statements

      Valuations of semirings (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      12 April 2018
      0 references
      The reader is assumed to be familiar with the field \(\mathbb F_1\) with one element, the projective line \(\mathbb P_{\mathbb F_1}^1\) and algebraic geometry, in particular tropical geometry. The notions of valuations introduced in this paper can be defined easily. The definition of a semiring differs from the the definition of a ring with identity element because we only require that the addition induces a structure of monoid with \(0\) instead of a structure of group. Now, a semifield is a semiring where the multiplication is commutative and every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse. The semifield \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\) is the ordered set \(\mathbb Q\cup\{-\infty\}\) together with operations \(\oplus\), \(\odot\) defined as follows. For \(x\), \(y\) in \(\mathbb Q\cup \{-\infty\}\), \(x\oplus y=\max (x,y)\) and, for \(x\), \(y\) in \(\mathbb Q\), \(x\odot y=x+y\). We extend \(\odot\) to \(\mathbb Q\cup \{-\infty\}\) by assuming that \(-\infty\) is an absorbing element. Note that the zero element is \(-\infty\), and \(0\) is the identity element. First, the author defines classical and strict valuations on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\), which are functions from \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\) to \(\mathbb R\cup\{-\infty\}\). Both of them satisfiy the rules \(\nu(\mathbb Q_{\max})\neq \{-\infty\}\), \(\nu(-\infty)=-\infty\), \(\nu(x\odot y)=\nu(x)+\nu(y)\), \(\nu(x\oplus y)\leq \max(\nu(x),\nu(y))\). The strict valuation satisfies in addition \(\nu(x\oplus y)= \max( \nu(x),\nu(y))\). For defining the third notion of valuation we need to introduce the tropical hyperfield \(\mathbb T\). It consists of the set \(\mathbb R\cup \{-\infty\}\), together with operations \(\boxplus\) and \(\boxdot\). The operation \(\boxdot\) is defined in the same way as \(\odot\) in \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\). Now, for \(x\), \(y\) in \(\mathbb R\cup\{-\infty\}\), \(x\boxplus y\) is a nonempty subset of \(\mathbb R\cup \{-\infty\}\) which is defined as follows. If \(x\neq y\), then \(x\oplus y=\{\max(x,y)\}\), otherwise \(x\boxplus y=[-\infty,x]\). Now, an hyperfield valuation on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\) is a mapping \(\nu\) from \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\) to \(\mathbb T\) such that \(\nu(\mathbb Q_{\max})\neq \{-\infty\}\), \(\nu(-\infty)=-\infty\) and, for every \(x\), \(y\in\mathbb Q_{\max}\), \(\nu(x\oplus y)\in \nu(x)\boxplus\nu(y)\), \(\nu(x\odot y)=\nu(x)\boxdot\nu(y)\). Any two classical (resp. strict, resp. hyperfield) valuations \(\nu_1\) and \(\nu_2\) are equivalent if there exists a positive real number \(\rho\) such that, for every \(x\), \(\nu_2(x)=\rho\nu_1(x)\). Now, we can quote the first theorem which is proved in this paper. Up to equivalence, there are exactly three classical valuations, two strict valuations, and two hyperfield valuations on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\). Next, let \(T\) be a variable. We define the ring \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\) of polynomials, by extending \(\oplus\) and \(\odot\) in the usual way. Since \((\mathbb Q_{\max}[T],\odot)\) is a not a group, \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\) is not a semifield. So, the author defines an equivalence relation \(\sim\) on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\) by setting, for every \(f(T\)), \(g(T)\) in \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\), \(f(T)\sim g(T) \Leftrightarrow \forall x\in \mathbb Q_{\max}\) \(f(x)=g(x)\). One can prove that \(\sim\) is compatible with \(\oplus\) and \(\odot\). Therefore, one can define the quotient structure \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]/\sim\), which is a semiring. Then, the author lets \(\mathbb Q_{\max}(T)\) be the quotient field of this semiring. Next, he considers the valuations on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\) which are trivial on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\), and he proves that there is, up to equivalence, exactly two non-trivial strict valuations on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\). Furthermore, he establishes a one-to-one correspondence between the set of equivalence classes of non-trivial hyperfield valuations on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\), and the set \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\cup \{\infty\}\). Turning to geometric aspects, the abstract curve associated to \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\) over \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\) is a topological space which as underlying set the set of the two equivalence classes of non-trivial strict valuations of \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]\) which are trivial on \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\), together with the cofinite topology. The author proves that it is homeomorphic to the subspace of \(\mathbb P_{\mathbb F_1}^1\) which consist of all closed points. Regarding hyperfield valuations, he constructs in an similar way the abstract nonsingular curve \(C_K\) associated to \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\). He shows that there is a canonical bijection between this curve and the set of closed points of the tropical projective line \(\mathbb P_{\mathbb Q_{\max}}^1\) over \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\). Furthermore, the semiring of global sections \(\mathcal O_{C_K}(C_K)\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb Q_{\max}\), and \(\mathcal O_{C_K}(C_K\setminus \{\infty\})\) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb Q_{\max}[T]/\sim\).
      0 references
      0 references
      semifield valuations
      0 references
      hyperfield valuations
      0 references
      tropical geometry
      0 references

      Identifiers