Linear maps preserving inclusion and equality of the spectrum to fixed sets (Q6586417)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7895555
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Linear maps preserving inclusion and equality of the spectrum to fixed sets
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7895555

      Statements

      Linear maps preserving inclusion and equality of the spectrum to fixed sets (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      13 August 2024
      0 references
      Let \(n\geq 2\) be an integer and let \(\mathcal{M}_{n}\) denote the set of \(n\times n\) matrices over an algebraically closed field \(\mathbb{F}\) of characteristic zero. For \(T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\) we denote by \(T^{t}\), \(\mathrm{tr}(T)\), and \(\sigma (T)\) its transpose, trace, and spectrum, respectively. The \(n\times n\) identity matrix is denoted by \(I_{n}\).\N\NMatrices having all their eigenvalues inside a fixed region \(D\) in the complex plane are usually called \(D\)-stable and sets of such matrices appear, as author pointed out, in, e.g., the theory of stability for dynamical systems. In [\textit{A. Guterman} et al., Linear Algebra Appl. 315, No. 1--3, 61--81 (2000; Zbl 0964.15004)] the authors proved the following result on maps preserving \(K\)-stable matrices.\N\NLet \(K\subseteq \mathbb{F}\) be a proper non-empty subset and \(\Phi \colon \mathcal{M}_{n}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{n}\) a bijective linear map such that \(\sigma (T)\subseteq K\) implies \(\sigma \left( \Phi (T)\right) \subseteq K\) for every \(T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\).\N\N\begin{itemize}\N\item[(i)] If \(K=\{0\}\), there exist \(c\in \mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\) and \(U,V\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\) with \(U\) invertible such that either\N\[\N\Phi (T)=cUTU^{-1}+\left(\mathrm{tr}(T)\right) V\qquad (T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}), \tag{2}\N\]\Nor\N\[\N\Phi (T)=cUT^{t}U^{-1}+\left( \mathrm{tr}(T)\right) V\qquad (T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}). \tag{3}\N\]\N\N\item[(ii)] If \(K=\mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\), there exist invertible matrices \(U,V\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\) such that either\N\[\N\Phi (T)=UTV\qquad (T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}), \tag{4}\N\]\Nor\N\[\N\Phi (T)=UT^{t}V\qquad (T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}). \tag{5}\N\]\N\N\item[(iii)] If \(K\neq \{0\}\) and \(K\neq \mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\), there exist \(c,d\in \mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\) with \(c\neq 0\) and an invertible \(U\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\) such that either\N\[\N\Phi (T)=cUTU^{-1}+d\left( \mathrm{tr}(T)\right) I_{n}\qquad (T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}), \tag{6}\N\]\Nor\N\[\N\Phi (T)=cUT^{t}U^{-1}+d\left( \mathrm{tr}(T)\right) I_{n}\qquad (T\in \mathcal{M} _{n}). \tag{7}\N\]\N\N\end{itemize}\N\NIn the paper under review, the author proves two main results. In the first part of the paper, he studies a variant of the problem considered in the statement of the above theorem. He proves the following result.\N\NLet \(K_{1},K_{2}\subseteq \mathbb{F}\) be two non-empty proper subsets and let \(\Phi \colon \mathcal{M}_{n}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{n}\) be a linear map such that\N\[\N\sigma (T)\subseteq K_{1}\quad \text{if and only if}\quad \sigma \left( \Phi (T)\right) \subseteq K_{2}\quad \text{for every }T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}. \tag{\(*\)}\N\]\NThen there exists a nonzero scalar \(\alpha \) such that \(K_{2}=\alpha K_{1}\). Moreover:\N\N\begin{itemize}\N\item[(i)] If \(K_{1}=\{0\}\), then \(K_{2}=\{0\}\) as well, and there exist \(c\in \mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\) and \(U,V\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\) with \(U\) invertible and \(c+\mathrm{tr}(V)\neq 0\) such that \(\Phi \) is either of the form (2) or (3).\N\N\item[(ii)] If \(K_{1}=\mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\), then \(K_{2}=\mathbb{F} \backslash \{0\}\) as well, and there exist invertible matrices \(U,V\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\) such that \(\Phi \) is either of the form (4) or (5).\N\N\item[(iii)] If \(K_{1}\neq \{0\}\) and \(K_{1}\neq \mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\), there exist \(c,d\in \mathbb{F}\backslash \{0\}\) with \(c\neq 0\) and \(c+nd\neq 0\), and an invertible \(U\in \mathcal{M}_{n}\) such that \(K_{2}=(c+nd)K_{1}\) and \(\Phi \) is either of the form (6) or (7).\N\end{itemize}\N\NIn the second part of the paper, the author considers the same type of preserver problem, but in this case equalities are used in (\(*\)). Also, since an \(n\times n\) matrix has at most \(n\) distinct eigenvalues, some natural restrictions on the number of elements for the sets \(K_{1}\) and \(K_{2}\) are imposed. Namely, for \(K_{1},K_{2}\subseteq \mathbb{F}\) with \(1\leq \left\vert K_{j}\right\vert \leq n\) for \(j=1,2\), the author characterizes linear maps \(\Phi \colon \mathcal{M}_{n}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}_{n}\) such that\N\[\N\sigma (T)=K_{1}\quad \text{if and only if}\quad \sigma \left( \Phi (T)\right) =K_{2}\quad \text{for every }T\in \mathcal{M}_{n}.\N\]
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references