Compliant control of a two-link flexible manipulator by constraint Hamiltonian system

DOI10.1016/S0094-114X(97)00041-4MaRDI QIDQ1301079zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Seung-Bok Choi, Hyuc-Bum Lee, Brian S. Thompson

Publication date 6 September 1999

Published in Mechanism and Machine Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-114x(97)00041-4

zbMATH Keywords

constraintsdeformable bodiesend-effectorflexibilityHamiltonian systemholonomic systemsrobotic manipulatorstabilitytwo-link flexible manipulator

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Kinematics of mechanisms and robots (70B15) Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory (93C85) Asymptotic stability in control theory (93D20)

Review text

The paper attempts to describe the control of a two-link flexible manipulator. But unfortunately a lot of confusion takes place. For example Hamiltonian equations are valid for holonomic systems, so the constraints do not depend on impulses. The first group of equations \(\dot q={\partial H\over\partial p_S}\) give the definition of the impulses and another group give the result of the transformation of a general dynamical equation. And only in the next group of equations the generalized forces: \(\dot q= -{\partial H\over\partial q_S}- Q_S\) are used. But here the generalized forces are entered in both groups of equations. The D'Alembert principle has another signification, namely: The dynamical equations may be rewritten in the form of static equations if one adds the inertia forces to the applied forces. The investigation of stability by the Lyapunov method is incorrect because, for example, the derivative of one term of the Lyapunov function \({\partial\over\partial t}(e^2_1)=2e_1\cdot\dot e_1\), where \(e_1= \theta_1- \theta^*_1\) is of variable sign. So it is impossible to guarantee the negative definiteness of the derivative of the Lyapunov function and the statement about stability makes no sense. Finally, it is relevant to remember that the description on how to account for the flexibility of deformable bodies is contained in the book of \textit{A. I. Lur'e} [Analytic Mechanics (Russisan), Moscow: FizMatLit (1961; Zbl 0103.39803)].

Recommendations

• Dynamic equations for a two-link flexible robot arm
• A Lagrangian Formulation of the Dynamic Model for Flexible Manipulator Systems
• Unconstrained and constrained motion control of a planar two‐link structurally flexible robotic manipulator
• On the feedforward torques and reference trajectory for flexible two-link arm
• Modelling and control of flexible robots
• Impulse control of a two-link manipulation robot
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 53640
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4102933
• A new approach to robust position/force control of flexible-joint robot manipulators
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1441913

Cited in

(1)

• Trajectory and Force Control of a Manipulator with Elastic Links

This page was built for publication: Compliant control of a two-link flexible manipulator by constraint Hamiltonian system

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1301079)