Agreeing to disagree and dilation
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2018.07.006zbMATH Open1448.68430OpenAlexW2883185645WikidataQ129506468 ScholiaQ129506468MaRDI QIDQ1726239FDOQ1726239
Authors: Jiji Zhang, T. Seidenfeld, Hai-Lin Liu 
Publication date: 20 February 2019
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v62/zhang17a/zhang17a.pdf
Recommendations
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Reaching a Consensus
- Knightian decision theory. I.
- Information, trade and common knowledge
- Agreeing to disagree
- Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete Information
- Some extensions of a claim of Aumann in an axiomatic model of knowledge
- We can't disagree forever
- Learning to agree
- Dilation for sets of probabilities
- The logical foundations of statistical inference
- The extent of non-conglomerability of finitely additive probabilities
- Interim efficient allocations under uncertainty
- Invariance properties of density ratio priors
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A no-trade theorem under Knightian uncertainty with general preferences
- Don't Bet on it: Contingent Agreements with Asymmetric Information
- The possibility of speculative trade between dynamically consistent agents.
- On the logic of ``agreeing to disagree type results
- Consensus, communication and knowledge: an extension with Bayesian agents
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Nonconglomerability for countably additive measures that are not \(\kappa\)-additive
Cited In (5)
This page was built for publication: Agreeing to disagree and dilation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1726239)
