An axiomatic theory of a risk dominance measure for bipolar games with linear incentives
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1890915
DOI10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80021-1zbMath0833.90131MaRDI QIDQ1890915
Publication date: 28 May 1995
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
91A05: 2-person games
Related Items
Some qualitative differences between the replicator dynamics of two player and n player games, Coordination after gains and losses: is prospect theory's value function predictive for games?, Perfect foresight dynamics in games with linear incentives and time symmetry, Playing safe in coordination games: The roles of risk dominance, payoff dominance, and history of play, Restricted and free-form cheap-talk and the scope for efficient coordination, Equilibrium selection in sequential games with imperfect information, On the contributions of John C. Harsanyi, John F. Nash and Reinhard Selten, Risk-dominance and perfect foresight dynamics in \(N\)-player games, A DIFFERENTIAL GAME APPROACH TO EVOLUTIONARY EQUILIBRIUM SELECTION, A COMPLEMENTARY NOTE ON THE ISSUE OF TIME INCONSISTENCY REVISITED AS AN EXTENDED GAME
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unique solutions for strategic games. Equilibrium selection based on resistance avoidance
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, Part III. The Basic Probability Distribution of the Game
- A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information
