Consistent cost sharing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1935922
DOI10.1007/s00186-011-0372-3zbMath1260.91131OpenAlexW2020493325MaRDI QIDQ1935922
Publication date: 20 February 2013
Published in: Mathematical Methods of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-011-0372-3
Cooperative games (91A12) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Related Items (2)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- General aggregation of demand and cost sharing methods
- Average cost pricing versus serial cost sharing: An axiomatic comparison
- Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems
- Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
- `Hydraulic' rationing
- The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
- On the axiomatic method and its recent applications to game theory and resource allocation
- Measure preserving transformations and rearrangements
- Incentives, Decentralized Control, the Assignment of Joint Costs and Internal Pricing
- On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
- Potential, Value, and Consistency
- Serial Cost Sharing
- Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
- The kernel of a cooperative game
- Mixed serial cost sharing.
This page was built for publication: Consistent cost sharing