``Small, yet beautiful: reconsidering the optimal design of multi-winner contests
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2013364
DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2017.05.012zbMATH Open1393.91076OpenAlexW2212590926MaRDI QIDQ2013364FDOQ2013364
Authors: Subhasish M. Chowdhury, Sang-Hyun Kim 
Publication date: 17 August 2017
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63705/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf
Recommendations
Cites Work
Cited In (23)
- Simple equilibria in general contests
- Optimal seedings in interdependent contests
- When is a talent contest not a talent contest? Sequential performance bias in expert evaluation
- Selecting contestants for a rent-seeking contest. A mechanism design approach
- A note on multi-winner contest mechanisms
- Optimal contest design under reverse-lottery technology
- Winner's effort maximization in large contests
- On the optimality of small research tournaments
- The beauty of ``bigness: On optimal design of multi-winner contests
- Gaining advantage by winning contests
- Multi-prize contests with expectation-based loss-averse players
- The optimal multi-stage contest
- Performance-maximizing large contests
- Conflict and competition over multi-issues
- Costly information providing in binary contests
- Your failure is my opportunity -- effects of elimination in contests
- A general framework to quantify the event importance in multi-event contests
- Large contests without single crossing
- When does division matter? Revisiting the optimal contest architecture
- Winner-leave versus loser-leave in multi-stage nested Tullock contests
- Centralized assignment of prizes and contestants
- Divisionalization in contests
- Multiple prizes in research tournaments
This page was built for publication: ``Small, yet beautiful: reconsidering the optimal design of multi-winner contests
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2013364)
