Strategic manipulation in group decisions with pairwise comparisons: a game theoretical perspective
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2079424
Recommendations
- Resilient heuristic aggregation of judgments in the pairwise comparisons method
- Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning
- Pareto optimality and strategy-proofness in group argument evaluation
- Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1986063
Cites work
- A course in game theory.
- A note on conflict resolution and truthtelling
- A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
- A study on the anonymity of pairwise comparisons in group decision making
- A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking
- Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process
- Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: theory and evidence
- Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages
- Handbook of social choice and welfare. Vol. 1.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3943488 (Why is no real title available?)
- Interactive decision aiding for group decision support
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- On the importance of behavioral operational research: the case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems
- On the monotonicity of the eigenvector method
- Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements
- PROPERTIES OF A POSITIVE RECIPROCAL MATRIX AND THEIR APPLICATION TO AHP
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- The possibility of group choice: pairwise comparisons and merging functions
- Visualizing group decisions in the analytic hierarchy process.
Cited in
(9)- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1986063 (Why is no real title available?)
- Pareto optimality and strategy-proofness in group argument evaluation
- Supermajority politics: equilibrium range, policy diversity, utilitarian welfare, and political compromise
- Resilient heuristic aggregation of judgments in the pairwise comparisons method
- Managing consensus in balanced networks based on opinion and trust/distrust evolutions
- Group AHP framework based on geometric standard deviation and interval group pairwise comparisons
- Almost optimal manipulation of pairwise comparisons of alternatives
- On random pairwise comparisons matrices and their geometry
- Formulating opinion dynamics from belief formation, diffusion and updating in social network group decision-making: towards developing a holistic framework
This page was built for publication: Strategic manipulation in group decisions with pairwise comparisons: a game theoretical perspective
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2079424)