Obvious manipulations in cake-cutting

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2103594

DOI10.1007/S00355-022-01416-4zbMATH Open1505.91201arXiv1908.02988OpenAlexW3123265466MaRDI QIDQ2103594FDOQ2103594


Authors: Josué Ortega, Erel Segal-Halevi Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 9 December 2022

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In cake-cutting, strategy-proofness is a very costly requirement in terms of fairness: for n=2 it implies a dictatorial allocation, whereas for n > 2 it requires that one agent receives no cake. We show that a weaker version of this property recently suggested by Troyan and Morril, called non-obvious manipulability, is compatible with the strong fairness property of proportionality, which guarantees that each agent receives 1/n of the cake. Both properties are satisfied by the leftmost leaves mechanism, an adaptation of the Dubins - Spanier moving knife procedure. Most other classical proportional mechanisms in literature are obviously manipulable, including the original moving knife mechanism. Non-obvious manipulability explains why leftmost leaves is manipulated less often in practice than other proportional mechanisms.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02988




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Obvious manipulations in cake-cutting

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2103594)