Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one's chances of winning?

DOI10.1007/S10683-006-9129-XMaRDI QIDQ2431823zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors C. Nicholas McKinney, John B. Van Huyck

Publication date 24 October 2006

Published in Experimental Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x

zbMATH Keywords

bounded rationalityexperimenthuman behaviorNimperfect information

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26) Experimental studies (91A90)

Recommendations

• Cognitive ability and strategic sophistication
• Skill, complexity, and strategic interaction
• Endogenous depth of reasoning
• A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games
• Why do they always win?

Cites work

• A backward induction experiment
• Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining
• On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence
• The chain store paradox

Cited in

(1)

• Eureka Learning: heuristics and response time in perfect information games

This page was built for publication: Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one's chances of winning?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2431823)