A backward induction experiment
From MaRDI portal
Publication:697945
DOI10.1006/JETH.2001.2910zbMATH Open1015.91015OpenAlexW2106419811MaRDI QIDQ697945FDOQ697945
Giovanni Ponti, Avner Shaked, Ken Binmore, John McCarthy, Larry Samuelson
Publication date: 18 September 2002
Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/48f7105c68f45394620b5b3ecacaecea9547e8a8
Recommendations
- Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining
- BACKWARD INDUCTION OR FORWARD REASONING? – AN EXPERIMENT OF STOCHASTIC ALTERNATING OFFER BARGAINING
- Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment
- Two-person bargaining behavior in fixed discounting factors games with infinite horizon
- Subgame perfection in ultimatum bargaining trees
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- What makes an allocation fair? Some experimental evidence.
- An empirical model of strategic choice with an application to coordination games
- Analogies, adaptation, and anomalies
- Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
- An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game
- Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
- Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs
- Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games
- Do People Rely on the Self-Interested Maximization of Others? An Experimental Test
- Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining
- More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games
- Do people exploit their bargaining power! An experimental study
- Measuring motivations for the reciprocal responses observed in a simple dilemma game
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Ultimatum bargaining behavior in Israel, Japan, Slovenia, and the United States: A social utility analysis
- Adaptive learning versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
Cited In (24)
- Motives behind cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma
- Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one's chances of winning?
- Introduction to experimental game theory
- Foresight, risk attitude, and utility maximization in naturalistic sequential high-stakes decision making
- BACKWARD INDUCTION OR FORWARD REASONING? – AN EXPERIMENT OF STOCHASTIC ALTERNATING OFFER BARGAINING
- Revealed preferences of individual players in sequential games
- Learning, words and actions: experimental evidence on coordination-improving information
- King of the Hill: giving backward induction its best shot
- Continuous level-\(k\) mechanism design
- Learning across games
- Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining
- Modelling equilibrium play as governed by analogy and limited foresight
- Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: the quantal hierarchy model of decision making
- Subgame perfection in ultimatum bargaining trees
- Non-equilibrium play in centipede games
- Economic harmony -- a rational theory of fairness and cooperation in strategic interactions
- The evolution of fairness under an assortative matching rule in the ultimatum game
- Aspiration adaptation in the ultimatum minigame.
- How does communication affect beliefs in one-shot games with complete information?
- Driving a hard bargain is a balancing act: how social preferences constrain the negotiation process
- Quantal-response equilibrium models of the ultimatum bargaining game
- An experimental analysis of asymmetric power in conflict bargaining
- David Lewis in the lab: experimental results on the emergence of meaning
- Limited foresight equilibrium
This page was built for publication: A backward induction experiment
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q697945)
