Are Newcomb problems really decisions?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2460152
DOI10.1007/S11229-006-9137-6zbMATH Open1125.03304OpenAlexW2125049038MaRDI QIDQ2460152FDOQ2460152
Authors: James M. Joyce
Publication date: 14 November 2007
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9137-6
Recommendations
- Egan and agents: how evidential decision theory can deal with Egan's dilemma
- Conditioning and Intervening
- Newcomb meets Gettier
- A reconstruction of Jeffrey's notion of ratifiability in terms of counterfactual beliefs
- A new problem with mixed decisions, or: you'll regret reading this article, but you still should
Decision theory (91B06) Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)
Cites Work
Cited In (9)
- The Dr. Psycho paradox and Newcomb's problem
- The faulty signal problem: counterfactual asymmetries in causal decision theory and rational deliberation
- Demons, deceivers and liars: Newcomb's malin génie
- A new problem with mixed decisions, or: you'll regret reading this article, but you still should
- Regret and instability in causal decision theory
- Ramsey and Joyce on deliberation and prediction
- Reversing 30~years of discussion: why causal decision theorists should one-box
- Newcomb meets Gettier
- Egan and agents: how evidential decision theory can deal with Egan's dilemma
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Are Newcomb problems really decisions?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2460152)